Madison, WI Header
File #: 38069    Version: 1 Name: Supporting U.S. Representatives Mark Pocan (D-WI) and Keith Ellison (D-MN) efforts to amend the U. S. Constitution to grant an explicit right to vote.
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 4/15/2015 In control: COMMON COUNCIL
On agenda: 4/21/2015 Final action: 4/21/2015
Enactment date: 4/23/2015 Enactment #: RES-15-00330
Title: Supporting U.S. Representatives Mark Pocan (D-WI) and Keith Ellison (D-MN) efforts to amend the U. S. Constitution to grant an explicit right to vote.
Sponsors: Shiva Bidar, Maurice S. Cheeks, Mark Clear, Matthew J. Phair, Chris Schmidt, Michael E. Verveer, David Ahrens, Ledell Zellers, Larry Palm, Steve King
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsWatch
4/21/20151 COMMON COUNCIL Adopt Under Suspension of Rules 2.04, 2.05, 2.24, and 2.25Pass Action details Meeting details Not available
4/15/20151 Council Office RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL TO ADOPT UNDER SUSPENSION OF RULES 2.04, 2.05, 2.24, & 2.25 - MISC. ITEMS  Action details Meeting details Not available
Fiscal Note
No appropriation required.

Title
Supporting U.S. Representatives Mark Pocan (D-WI) and Keith Ellison (D-MN) efforts to amend the U. S. Constitution to grant an explicit right to vote.

Body
WHEREAS, voter turnout in Wisconsin was approximately 70% of eligible voters in the 2012 presidential election, which means about 1.3 million of Wisconsin’s eligible voters did not cast a vote; and,

WHEREAS, Wisconsin has enacted legislation (“Act 23”) that could impact eligible voters’ ability to vote, specifically by requiring voters show certain forms of photo identification before being allowed to cast regular ballots; and

WHEREAS, Wisconsin’s Act 23 has been classified as “strict” by the National Conference of State Legislatures, which means Wisconsin is among those states that place the highest barriers to casting a ballot; and

WHEREAS, the legality of Act 23 has been the subject of litigation in both state and federal court; and

WHEREAS, following an initial injunction against Act 23’s enforcement by a Wisconsin district court, the state judiciary continues to evaluate the law; and

WHEREAS, plaintiffs in the federal litigation have raised serious claims as to the racially discriminatory effects of Act 23’s photo ID requirement; and

WHEREAS, of the 199 nations that elect their public officials using democratic elections, the United States is one of only 11 nations that does not have an explicit right to vote in its constitution; and

WHEREAS, the 15th, 19th, and 26th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution provide that the right to vote shall not be denied or abridged based on race, sex, and age respectively, and the 24th Amendment prohibits poll taxes, but these amendments do not guarantee Americans an explicit right to vote; and

WHEREAS, in 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in Shelby County v. Holder that the coverage formula in Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) is unconstitutional, thereby invalidating the formula used to determine which ...

Click here for full text