|
19226
| 1 | | 705 Riverside Dr | Miscellaneous | 705 Riverside Drive (M-7-32-2010)
Patrick Mooney appealing MGO 27.05(2)(i). The rule requires that the railing comply with Comm 21.04(3). The rule requires that the guard rail be 36" in height. The railing is on the second floor of a single family house built in 1918. The porch is used for morning coffee. The space between rails is 2 3/4" and is Code compliant. The variance requested is to allow the existing height of 28 1/2" to remain. | Table | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
19231
| 1 | | 30 N Hancock St | Miscellaneous | 30 N. Hancock Street (M-7-33-2010)
Robert Bloch and Brenda Konkel appealing MGO 27.05(2)(i). The rule requires that the railing comply with Comm 21.04(3). The rule requires the guard rail be 36" in height. The variance requested is to keep the height as designed in 1910. This is a single family, owner-occupied home. | Grant with Condition(s) and Close the Public Hearing | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
19233
| 1 | | 23 & 25 N Pinckney St | Miscellaneous | 23 & 25 N. Pinckney Street (C-7-34-2010)
Sonya Newenhouse appealing IBC 1104.3. The rule requires circulation between the two spaces. There is a 12" vertical difference between the spaces and it is nearly impossible to overcome the elevation due to site constraints. Both spaces have accessible entrances and contain a bar, dining area and ADA bathroom. Equal facilities are provided in both areas. The only use of the door between is for wait staff. The intent of equal facilites has been met. | Grant with Condition(s) and Close the Public Hearing | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|