Madison, WI Header
File #: 19031    Version: 1 Name: Final Report: Common Council Work Group to Review Snow Policies & Procedures, June 2010
Type: Report Status: Accepted
File created: 6/29/2010 In control: COMMON COUNCIL ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITTEE (ended 4/2017)
On agenda: 7/6/2010 Final action: 8/3/2010
Enactment date: Enactment #:
Title: Final Report: Common Council Work Group to Review Snow Policies & Procedures, June 2010
Attachments: 1. Final Report Common Council Work Group to Review Snow Policies & Procedures, 2. 7/29/10 Snow Policies Procedures Ranking sheet
Title
Final Report: Common Council Work Group to Review Snow Policies & Procedures, June 2010
Body
In the last several years, Madison has seen above-average snowfalls. While the overall time to plow all city streets has remained effectively steady, the early heavy snowfalls caused heavy rutting and other quality of life issues across the city. On December 8-9, 2009 a large storm dumped approximately 18” of snow across the City. The snow had a high water content and the resulting road conditions led Mayor Cieslewicz to order a top-to-bottom review of the City’s response. The report was available on December 24, 2009 and outlined several operational changes that could be implemented to improve the quality of response to snowstorms.

At its first meeting following the December 2010 storm, the Common Council Organizational Committee asked several questions of the Mayor’s Office and Streets Superintendent Al Schumacher. It was determined that a Council Work Group be formed to look at the issues in more detail, with the goal of formulating policy and budget adjustments that would improve the city’s response to snowstorms.

From the beginning, it was recognized that the record-breaking and near record-breaking snowfall seasons of recent years were remarkable in their magnitude and the stresses they had placed on the City’s resources. It was also recognized that the Streets Division had not been growing at a pace to match the City’s growth, and that several new technologies had recently become available that could be explored. Previous equipment improvements had made up some of the difference between the growth of the City and the growth of the Streets Division, but one of the main questions the Work Group set out to address was whether the Streets Division needed additional resources and employees in order to function optimally. The Work Group also examined new equipment options, changes to practices such as pre-wetting of pavement with a brine solution and exc...

Click here for full text