Madison, WI Header
File #: 02995    Version: 1 Name: amendments to inclusionary zoning
Type: Ordinance Status: Filed
File created: 2/15/2006 In control: COMMON COUNCIL
On agenda: 7/11/2006 Final action: 7/11/2006
Enactment date: Enactment #:
Title: Amending Section 28.04(25) of the Madison General Ordinances to change the equity distribution at sale and add exemptions to the inclusionary zoning ordinance.
Sponsors: Robbie Webber, Michael E. Verveer, Judy K. Olson, Brenda K. Konkel, Austin W. King, Tim Gruber, David J. Cieslewicz, Brian Benford
Attachments: 1. 02995Body.pdf, 2. HousingCommMinutes-010406.pdf, 3. EDCMinutes-010906.pdf, 4. Hyperlink to File ID 02363, 5. 02995Maps.pdf, 6. OCA-Memo-040306.pdf, 7. Hyperlink to File ID 03588, 8. 02995 registration stmt.pdf, 9. 02995 Alder Amendment.pdf, 10. 02995 amendment.pdf
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsWatch
7/11/20061 COMMON COUNCIL Place On FilePass Action details Meeting details Not available
7/10/20061 PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL TO PLACE ON FILE - PUBLIC HEARINGPass Action details Meeting details Not available
6/19/20061 PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL TO RE-REFER - RECESSED PUBLIC HEARINGPass Action details Meeting details Not available
6/6/20061 COMMON COUNCIL Re-refer for Recessed Public Hearing  Action details Meeting details Not available
6/5/20061 PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL TO RE-REFER - RECESSED PUBLIC HEARINGPass Action details Meeting details Not available
4/4/20061 COMMON COUNCIL Re-refer for Recessed Public HearingPass Action details Meeting details Not available
3/20/20061 PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL TO RE-REFER - PUBLIC HEARINGPass Action details Meeting details Not available
2/21/20061 COMMON COUNCIL Refer For Public Hearing  Action details Meeting details Not available
2/15/20061 Attorney's Office/Approval Group Approved As To Form  Action details Meeting details Not available
2/15/20061 Attorney's Office Fiscal Note Required / Approval  Action details Meeting details Not available
2/15/20061 Finance Dept/Approval Group Approved Fiscal Note By The Comptroller's Office  Action details Meeting details Not available
2/15/20061 Attorney's Office Referred for Introduction  Action details Meeting details Not available
Fiscal Note
This ordinance amendment would modify the sharing of potential equity proceeds in owner occupied affordable housing units between the City and the income eligible owners. Under the current ordinance, any equity generated upon resale of an affordable unit would be shared between the City and the seller based on a complex scheduled calculation incorporating the number of years the owner has lived in the unit, the level of appreciation in each year and other factors including the value of improvements made by the owner. The current formula would result in the owner receiving from 0% to 50% of any equity appreciation which occurred during the period of ownership, with the City receiving the remaining majority. No owner occupied inclusionary zoning units have been sold to date, so there is no actual experience administering the details of this equity sharing formula.

The proposed ordinance amendment would replace this formula with a sharing arrangement where the City would receive a proportionate share of any appreciation based on the "discounted" price originally paid for the property by the income eligible buyer. For example, if the inclusionary zoning ordinance resulted in an initial purchase price of a unit that was calculated to be 80% of the appraised value, then the buyer would receive 80% of any appreciation and the City would receive the remaining 20%. This change in methodology would simplify many of the reporting and calculation requirements of the current equity calculation formula and would clearly increase the share of future equity accrued by the individual property owners while reducing the City's share by a corresponding amount.

It is difficult to predict, however, what impact this change might have on the total amount of equity appreciation returned to the City. Under the early operation of the existing ordinance, it has been reported that there is very little demand for the first available inclusionary units, perhaps because...

Click here for full text