From: Mary Carbine
[MCarbine@visitdowntownmadison.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011
1:16 PM
To: Allen, Roger; Austin Buerosse;
Barb Mercer; Bidar-Sielaff, Shiva; Christianson, Eric; David Hart; Dawn Crim;
Schumacher, Michael; Verveer, Mike; pambean; Tom Farley; Tom Landgraf;
Tretow-Schmitz, Jean; Witzel-Behl, Maribeth; Schauf, Mary
Cc: Woulf, Mark
Subject: BID - ALDO - ALRC meeting Feb.
16
Attachments: BID_ALDO_Position_Brief_2011.pdf;
Leasing Timelines.pdf
Dear
ALRC members,
The
BID Board and stakeholders look forward to continued discussion of the final
report from the ALRC Downtown Subcommittee at the Feb. 16 meeting (agenda item
22).
The
BID shares the goals of a safe and vibrant downtown, reduced alcohol-related
disorder, and a positive business mix in the downtown. The BID continues
to maintain that the ALDO does little to reduce alcohol related disorder, and that
other measures (such as proactive regulation of licensed establishments) are
more effective. The BID maintains that the ALDO should be allowed to
sunset, and be substantially amended if extended.
Specific
BID feedback on the “Summary of suggested changes” (i.e., amendments to ALDO, http://legistar.cityofmadison.com/detailreport/matter.aspx?key=21985):
-365
day limit – BID recommended eliminating this, or extending to at least 1095
days (3 years) rather than the 730 days discussed at the last ALRC
meeting. Attached is a sample commercial leasing timeline prepared and
endorsed by commercial real estate brokers and presented to the ALRC
Subcommittee in December, which shows that leasing a downtown commercial
property can take 3+ years.
-The
BID supports the concepts of an “Entertainment Venue” category that permits
license applications for businesses that are neither a restaurant nor bar, and
which offer entertainment.
-For
proposed “Entertainment Venue,” BID recommends an allowable alcohol revenue
percentage of at least 75% (lower than that does not match realistic business
models). As pointed out at the Jan. 19 ALRC meeting, any 65% figure
discussed is a compromise percentage, not the ceiling for percentages discussed
at the ALRC Subcommittee meetings (which I attended). Some subcommittee members
indicated they would consider higher than 65%.
-Entertainment
Venue Capacity – BID is concerned about limitation of licensed capacity to
dedicated seating capacity. What about business models that involve
dancing or audience participation? This may limit viable business plans.
-Entertainment
Venue - Business Plan – BID opposed the requirement of detailed business plan
“with level of detail normally required by lending institution.” This level of
detail would require public disclosure of confidential, competitive
information. BID instead recommends a set of standard questions on the
application, or asking for a standard-format business outline (3 pages).
-Entertainment
Venue- Annual Audit. BID opposes as an undue financial burden on
business. Audits costs at minimum $1,000-$1,500, with likely cost for
analyzing receipts more like $3,500 -$5,000 – a real burden, especially for
small or locally owned businesses. Also, revenues tell only one part of
the business story. What about expenses? BID instead recommends that
Entertainment venue businesses submit standard set of information (such as
percentage of revenues and expenses devoted to entertainment) at renewal time.
--Exceptional
circumstances: BID supports the original proposed change of regular (non
entertainment) Exceptional Circumstances alcohol revenue percentage from 25% to
50%. This change was fully discussed and approved by consensus at the
January 11 ALRC Subcommittee meeting (which I attended).
-Annual
Review: The BID supports the proposed changes to the annual review.
Thank
you & see you Wed. evening.
My
best,
_________________________________________
Executive
Director
Mailing
Address:
Location:
t:
(608) 512-1340
f: (608) 204-9028